Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;14:10. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2020.00010

Table 3.

Averaged %FIT for ΔHbO and ΔHbR over all channels using KRLS with the polynomial kernel after training and testing.

Sub. %FIT
q = 1 (0.1 s) q = 5(0.54 s) q = 10 (1.08 s) q = 15 (1.63 s) q = 20 (2.17 s)
ΔHbO ΔHbR ΔHbO ΔHbR ΔHbO ΔHbR ΔHbO ΔHbR ΔHbO ΔHbR
1 93.5
± 2.4
92.6
± 2.4
91.6
± 3.4
90.6
± 2.6
89.1
± 5.1
88.1
± 3.2
86.5
± 6.6
85.7
± 3.8
84.1
± 7.9
83.6
± 4.3
2 94.3
± 0.9
87.5
± 14.1
91.7
± 2.1
84.7
± 13.7
88.4
± 4.0
81.0
± 13.4
85.2
± 5.7
77.5
± 13.4
82.4
± 7.4
74.4
± 13.7
3 94.0
± 1.2
83.1
± 19.7
91.4
± 1.9
80.4
± 19.7
88.1
± 3.2
77.1
± 20.0
84.8
± 4.6
73.8
± 20.4
81.9
± 5.8
71.1
± 21.0
4 94.5
± 1.1
89.5
± 7.3
92.6
± 1.5
87.6
± 7.3
89.9
± 2.7
85.1
± 7.4
87.3
± 4.0
82.5
± 7.7
84.8
± 5.2
80.3
± 8.1
5 94.2
± 1.8
90.5
± 8.0
91.9
± 2.2
87.8
± 7.6
89.1
± 2.3
84.2
± 7.3
85.7
± 4.5
80.8
± 7.2
83.1
± 4.9
78.0
± 7.3
6 94.7
± 0.8
91.8
± 4.9
93.3
± 1.5
89.7
± 5.2
91.2
± 2.5
87.1
± 5.8
89.0
± 3.7
84.4
± 6.6
86.7
± 4.8
82.1
± 7.5
7 95.1
± 0.9
94.1
± 2.9
93.1
± 1.4
92.2
± 2.8
90.6
± 2.4
89.9
± 3.1
88.2
± 3.5
87.6
± 3.4
86.0
± 4.5
85.5
± 3.9
8 94.5
± 0.9
91.2
± 4.3
92.1
± 1.6
88.9
± 4.5
89.3
± 2.5
86.0
± 4.9
86.9
± 3.4
83.2
± 5.5
84.8
± 4.2
80.8
± 6.1
9 94.1
± 0.9
93.6
± 0.8
92.2
± 1.5
91.5
± 1.3
89.5
± 2.4
88.5
± 2.9
86.9
± 3.4
85.5
± 3.6
84.6
± 4.3
82.8
± 4.7
10 95.3
± 0.9
93.8
± 2.4
93.6
± 1.4
91.2
± 2.2
91.4
± 2.4
88.1
± 2.8
89.4
± 3.4
85.2
± 3.8
87.4
± 4.8
82.6
± 4.9
11 94.4
± 0.8
93.3
± 1.6
92.8
± 1.4
91.3
± 1.8
90.6
± 2.3
88.7
± 2.5
88.4
± 3.1
86.1
± 3.4
86.4
± 3.8
83.8
± 4.3
Mean
± SD
94.4
± 1.1
91.0
± 6.2
92.4
± 1.8
88.7
± 6.2
89.7
± 2.9
85.8
± 6.7
87.1
± 4.2
82.9
± 7.2
84.7
± 5.2
80.5
± 7.8