Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;14:10. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2020.00010

Table 4.

Averaged %FIT for ΔHbO and ΔHbR over all channels using KRLS with the sigmoid kernel after training and testing.

Sub. %FIT
q = 1 (0.1 s) q = 5 (0.54 s) q = 10 (1.08 s) q = 15 (1.63 s) q = 20 (2.17 s)
ΔHbO ΔHbR ΔHbO ΔHbR ΔHbO ΔHbR ΔHbO ΔHbR ΔHbO ΔHbR
1 86.3
± 13.2
66.1
± 24.5
84.1
± 12.9
64.2
± 24.2
81.5
± 12.7
61.8
± 23.9
78.9
± 12.6
59.5
± 23.7
76.7
± 12.6
57.4
± 23.6
2 87.5
± 9.7
63.6
± 26.2
84.5
± 9.2
60.9
± 25.1
80.8
± 9.1
57.4
± 23.8
77.3
± 9.2
54.1
± 22.8
74.2
± 9.7
51.2
± 22.1
3 84.0
± 13.2
53.8
± 27.3
81.0
± 12.8
51.5
± 26.6
77.2
± 12.4
48.7
± 25.8
73.7
± 12.3
45.8
± 25.1
70.7
± 12.3
43.4
± 24.5
4 86.8
± 13.6
61.6
± 27.1
84.6
± 13.5
59.7
± 26.8
81.7
± 13.4
57.2
± 26.6
78.9
± 13.3
54.7
± 26.4
76.3
± 13.4
52.5
± 26.3
5 89.1
± 6.2
70.2
± 19.1
86.4
± 6.1
67.8
± 18.6
82.9
± 6.2
64.6
± 18.0
79.7
± 6.6
61.7
± 27.5
76.8
± 7.3
59.1
± 17.3
6 87.9
± 10.7
73.9
± 22.9
86.2
± 10.5
72
± 22.6
83.8
± 10.4
69.4
± 22.2
81.4
± 10.4
66.9
± 21.9
79.1
± 10.5
64.7
± 21.7
7 94.0
± 3.2
84.7
± 16.7
91.8
± 3.4
82.8
± 16.4
89.2
± 3.8
80.4
± 16.1
86.6
± 4.4
78.1
± 15.8
84.2
± 5.1
76.0
± 15.7
8 84.3
± 16.5
66.8
± 20.1
82.1
± 16.1
64.8
± 19.7
79.4
± 15.6
62.2
± 19.2
77.1
± 15.3
59.7
± 18.8
74.9
± 15.0
57.4
± 18.5
9 91.1
± 5.8
82.3
± 13.4
88.7
± 5.5
79.8
± 13.0
85.8
± 5.2
76.6
± 12.6
83.1
± 5.2
73.7
± 12.3
80.8
± 5.4
71.2
± 12.2
10 90.3
± 6.4
75.4
± 18.4
88.4
± 6.3
73.1
± 17.8
86.1
± 6.3
70.2
± 17.2
83.8
± 6.5
67.5
± 17.0
81.7
± 7.0
65.1
± 16.9
11 91.3
± 4.5
76.4
± 22.7
89.4
± 4.5
74.0
± 22.2
86.9
± 4.6
70.9
± 21.5
84.5
± 4.9
68.1
± 21.1
82.4
± 5.2
65.5
± 20.9
Mean
± SD
88.4
± 9.3
70.4
± 21.6
86.1
± 9.2
68.2
± 21.2
83.2
± 9.1
65.4
± 20.6
80.4
± 9.2
62.7
± 21.1
77.9
± 9.4
60.3
± 19.9