Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 10;13(3):802. doi: 10.3390/ma13030802

Table 3.

Comparison of the epithelial width (the distance between PM and aJE) between deferred and immediate implants in both the buccal and lingual sides (mm) among the implant subgroups. * Statistically significant inter-group comparisons according to ANOVA test (p < 0.05).

Epithelial Width Immediate Implants
(n = 40)
Delayed Implants
(n = 40)
Comparisons by
Student T; p-Value
Buccal Lingual Buccal Lingual Buccal Lingual
Mean (sd) Mean (sd) Mean (sd) Mean (sd)
Strauman BL 2.0(0.6) 2.1(1.7) 2.2(0.5) 0.9(0.3) T = 0.5
p = 0.65
T = 1.8
p = 0.11
IPX-Std 2.6(1.3) 2.0(1.1) 2.1(0.9) 1.4(0.5) T = 0.9
p = 0.39
T = 1.3
p = 0.22
IPX-Half 2.7(1.3) 2.1(1.1) 2.2(0.5) 1.2(0.7) T = 1.1
p = 0.30
T = 1.9
p = 0.08
IPX-Full 2.9(1.0) * 1.9(0.6) 2.1(0.5) * 1.3(0.7) T = 2.1
p = 0.05
T = 1.8
p = 0.10
IPX-Control 2.4(0.9) 1.8(0.5) 2.3(0.6) 1.3(0.5) T = 0.2
p = 0.82
T = 1.9
p = 0.08
Comparisons by ANOVA; F = 0.7
p = 0.60
F = 0.1
p = 0.97
F = 0.1
p = 0.97
F = 0.8
p = 0.53
p-value