Table 3.
Mean ± standard deviation of volume density of new bone formation. Comparison among periods within the same group was evaluated by one-way ANOVA (column, 10 vs. 20 vs. 40 vs. 60 days). Comparison between defects treated with biomaterial vs. clot per condition (non-alcoholic and alcoholic) (line, CCG vs. BCG and CEG vs. BEG).
| Period (Days) | Volume Density of New Bone Formation (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Alcoholic Rat (n = 5/Period) | Alcoholic Rat (n = 5/Period) | |||||
| CCG | BCG | Paired t-Test (p) |
CEG | BEG | Paired t-Test (p) |
|
| 10 | 5.30 ± 3.08 a | 7.54 ± 6.56 a | 0.326 | 6.67 ± 3,09 a | 6.98 ± 5,97 a | 0.852 |
| 20 | 8.41 ± 5.17 a | 13.79 ± 11.14 a | 0.370 | 12.33 ± 1,89 a,b | 7.96 ± 4,40 a | 0.156 |
| 40 | 15.50 ± 7.14 a | 12.97 ± 7.07 a | 0.610 | 17.42 ± 2,78 b | 9.59 ± 4,59 a | 0.018 |
| 60 | 14.51 ± 7.69 a | 13.34 ± 12.45 a | 0.865 | 18.29 ± 7,89 b,* | 12.85 ± 7,94 a,* | 0.122 |
| One way ANOVA (p) |
0.05 | 0.618 | 0.007 | 0.466 | ||
Different letters (a ≠ b) indicate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05), except for asterisks (*) that do not show significant difference (CEG vs. BEG; p = 0.122).