Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 24;18:42. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01824-9

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies (N = 25)

Study ID/date Study design Time Definition of high-risk PCa Median age (RP vs RT) Sample (n) Comparison of treatments Median follow-up End-points
Jayadevappa 2019 R. cohort 1996–2003 GS ≥ 8 or T ≥ T2c NA 6296 RP vs EBRT vs EBRT + BT 10 years OS/CSS
Reichard 2019 R. cohort 2004–2013 NCCN 66 vs 61 304 RP vs RT 82.9 months OS/MFS
Caño-Velasco 2019 R. cohort 1996–2008 EAU 65 vs 71 286 RP vs EBRT

RP: 152 months

RT: 97 months

CSS/OS
Muralidhar 2019 R. cohort 2004–2012 GS: 9–10 NA

4367

2276

RP+aRT vs EBRT+BT

6.0 years (NCDB)

5.8 years (SEER)

OS
Berg 2019 R. cohort 2004–2015 NCCN 58.15 vs 58.12 13985 RP vs EBRT+BT

RP: 91 months

EBRT+BT: 101 months

OS
Tilki 2019 R. cohort 1992–2013 GS: 9–10

MaxRT: 70.34

RP: 66. 40

RP+aRT:66.64 MaxRP: 66.04

RP+ADT: 66.38

639

RP vs RP+aRT vs MaxRP vs RP+ADT

vs MaxRT

MaxRT: 5.51 years

RP: 4.89 years

RP + aRT: 3.87 years

MaxRP: 4.88 years

RP + ADT: 4.65 years

CSS/OS
Jang 2018 R. cohort 1992–2009 T ≥ T3 NA 13856 RP+aRT vs RT 14.6 years CSS/OS
Tyson 2018 P. cohort 2011–2012 D’Amico 65 2117 RP vs EBRT 3 years QoL
Ennis 2018 R. cohort 2004–2013 NCCN

RP vs EBRT vs EBRT+BT:

62.61 vs 69.66 vs 67.15

42765 RP vs EBRT vs EBRT+BT 36.34 months OS
Gu 2018 R. cohort 2004–2008 NCCN 66 7656 RP vs EBRT NA CSS/OS
Markovina 2018 R. cohort 2002–2011 NCCN 62.9 vs 64.2 246 RP vs EBRT

RP: 41 months

RT: 51.4 months

OS/MFS
Kishan 2018 R. cohort 2000–2013 GS: 9–10

RP vs EBRT vs EBRT+BT:

61 vs 67.7 vs 67.5

1809

RP vs EBRT vs EBRT+BT

61 vs 67.7 vs 67.5

RP: 4.2 years EBRT: 5.1 years EBRT + BT: 6.3 years CSS/OS/MFS
Robinson 2018 R. cohort 1998–2012 NCCN 63.1 vs 67 41953 RP vs RT

RP: 7.3 years

RT: 6.9 years

CSS
Feldman 2017 R. cohort 1992–2009 T3 71.76 vs 71.75 2935 RP vs EBRT

RP: 11.47 years

EBRT: 7.04 years

OS/CSS/QoL
Ciezki 2017 P. cohort 1996–2012 NCCN

LDRBT vs EBRT vs RP:

70 vs 68.5 vs 62

2557 LDRBT vs EBRT vs RP

LDRBT: 48.9 months

EBRT: 94.6 months

RP: 55.6 months

BRFS/CSS/QoL
Yamamoto 2015 P. cohort 2006–2010 NCCN 67 vs 71 150 RP vs EBRT 2 years QoL
Sun 2014 R. cohort 1992–2005 T2c 70 vs 73 67087 RP vs RT vs WW NA OS/CSS
Hoffman 2013 R. cohort 1994–1995 PSA > 10 or GS 8–10 NA 1655 RP vs EBRT 15 years OS/CSS
Kibel 2012 R. cohort 1995–2005 D’Amico

RP vs EBRT vs BT:

60 vs 69 vs 68(Clinic 1)

61 vs 70 vs 69(Clinic 2)

10429 RP vs EBRT vs BT 67 months OS/CSS
Westover 2012 R. cohort 1988–2009 D’Amico 65 vs 70 657 RP vs EBRT+BT

RP: 7.6 years

EBRT + BT: 3.6 years

CSS
Boorjian 2011 R. cohort 1988–2004 NCCN

RP: 66

EBRT+ADT: 68.8

EBRT: 69.3

1847 RP vs EBRT+ADT vs EBRT

RP: 10.2 years

EBRT + ADT: 6.0 years

EBRT: 7.3 years

OS/CSS
Aizer 2009 R. cohort 1997–2005 MSK/NCCN NA 556 RP vs EBRT

RP: 46 months

EBRT: 40 months

BRFS
Takizawa 2009 R. cohort 1998–2004 NCCN 64.9 vs 71.1 162 RP vs EBRT 41 months OS/BRFS/QoL
Arcangeli 2009 R. cohort 2003–2007 NCCN 65.5 vs 75 284 RP vs EBRT RP: 33.8 months EBRT: 38.6 months BRFS
Akakura 2006 RCT 1989–1993 T2b-3N0M0 68.1 vs 68.7 95 RP vs EBRT 102 months BRFS/CSS/OS/QoL

RP prostatectomy, RT radiotherapy, EBRT external beam radiation therapy, BT brachytherapy, ADT androgen deprivation therapy, aRT adjuvant radiotherapy, WW watchful waiting, MaxRP RP + aRT + ADT, MaxRT EBRT + BT + ADT, LDRBT low-dose-rate brachytherapy, PSA prostate-specific antigen, GS Gleason score, NCCN National Comprehensive Cancer Network, MSK Memorial Sloan Kettering, QoL quality of life, OS overall survival, CSS cancer-specific survival, BRFS biochemical recurrence-free survival, MFS metastasis-free survival, CRF clinical recurrence-free survival, R. cohort retrospective cohort, P. cohort prospective cohort, P. and R. cohort prospective and retrospective cohort, RCT randomized controlled trial, vs versus, NA not available