Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 24;21:70. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-3392-2

Table 3.

AUTPR@k, AUROC and AUPR values for the dataset HMDD, obtained with the best configuration (α=0.2,β=0.4) at different levels of the hierarchy

AUTPR@k AUPR AUROC
LP-HCLUS-NoLP 0.000000 0.000000 0.496169
ncPred 0.087370 0.007540 0.584268
LP-HCLUS AVG Level 1 0.042658 0.005437 0.523872
Level 2 0.056392 0.003140 0.548665
Level 3 0.020129 0.000469 0.515470
LP-HCLUS MAX Level 1 0.088130 0.010865 0.568056
Level 2 0.109292 0.013420 0.585560
Level 3 0.104244 0.011983 0.580824
LP-HCLUS MIN Level 1 0.031888 0.001935 0.519936
Level 2 0.032765 0.001232 0.524077
Level 3 0.011012 0.000170 0.505846
LP-HCLUS EC Level 1 0.005626 0.000035 0.501872
Level 2 0.004851 0.000030 0.500943
Level 3 0.006493 0.000050 0.502762
HOCCLUS2 AVG Level 1 0.018339 0.000839 0.511722
Level 2 0.016484 0.000670 0.509663
Level 3 0.012082 0.000287 0.507020
HOCCLUS2 MAX Level 1 0.018332 0.000829 0.510398
Level 2 0.016065 0.000659 0.508897
Level 3 0.011150 0.000274 0.506331
HOCCLUS2 MIN Level 1 0.015922 0.000753 0.509336
Level 2 0.016401 0.000668 0.509542
Level 3 0.011647 0.000270 0.506575
HOCCLUS2 EC Level 1 0.013922 0.000536 0.507314
Level 2 0.013717 0.000352 0.507112
Level 3 0.013065 0.000253 0.507751

The results in terms of AUPR and AUROC values can only be used for relative comparison and not as absolute evaluation measures because they are spoiled by the assumption made on unknown associations, that are considered as negative examples

The best result is highlighted in boldface.