Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 24;21:70. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-3392-2

Table 4.

AUTPR@k, AUROC and AUPR values for the dataset ID, obtained with the best configuration (α=0.1,β=0.4) at different levels of the hierarchy

AUTPR@k AUPR AUROC
LP-HCLUS-NoLP 0.024087 0.000150 0.525501
ncPred 0.015365 0.000087 0.521975
LP-HCLUS AVG Level 1 0.024335 0.000198 0.532059
Level 2 0.013660 0.000080 0.519290
Level 3 0.005883 0.000024 0.510396
LP-HCLUS MAX Level 1 0.070639 0.001218 0.567991
Level 2 0.054821 0.000780 0.554388
Level 3 0.055141 0.000756 0.551873
LP-HCLUS MIN Level 1 0.005451 0.000010 0.504690
Level 2 0.000474 0.000000 0.500490
Level 3 0.000305 0.000000 0.500154
LP-HCLUS EC Level 1 0.004609 0.000010 0.506366
Level 2 0.005605 0.000013 0.505695
Level 3 0.005353 0.000010 0.505862
HOCCLUS2 AVG Level 1 0.002246 0.000087 0.502169
Level 2 0.002553 0.000006 0.502843
Level 3 0.000885 0.000001 0.501328
HOCCLUS2 MAX Level 1 0.002238 0.000087 0.502169
Level 2 0.002659 0.000005 0.502676
Level 3 0.000973 0.000001 0.500826
HOCCLUS2 MIN Level 1 0.002247 0.000087 0.502169
Level 2 0.002553 0.000006 0.502843
Level 3 0.000885 0.000001 0.501328
HOCCLUS2 EC Level 1 0.002763 0.000015 0.502337
Level 2 0.002320 0.000008 0.501835
Level 3 0.003533 0.000007 0.503683

The results in terms of AUPR and AUROC values can only be used for relative comparison and not as absolute evaluation measures because they are spoiled by the assumption made on unknown associations, that are considered as negative examples

The best result is highlighted in boldface.