Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;12:29. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00029

TABLE 6.

Relation bn on mediation analysis.

Coeff Se t p Std
RT congruent
TST IP to AP 0.37 0.83 0.44 0.66 0.24
TST AP to IP 0.29 0.73 0.40 0.69 0.18
RT IP to AP −0.18 0.25 −0.75 0.46 −0.36
RT AP to IP 0.14 0.15 0.95 0.35 0.46
RevT IP to AP −0.23 0.25 −0.90 0.38 −0.44
RevT AP to IP 0.06 0.17 0.39 0.70 0.19
RT neutral
TST IP to AP 0.10 0.81 0.12 0.91 0.06
TST AP to IP 0.70 0.71 0.97 0.34 0.39
RT IP to AP −0.27 0.24 −1.13 0.27 −0.49
RT AP to IP −0.30 0.15 −2.03 0.05 −0.88
RevT IP to AP −0.19 0.25 −0.78 0.44 −0.34
RevT AP to IP −0.15 0.16 −0.95 0.35 −0.43
RT incongruent
TST IP to AP −0.30 0.50 −0.61 0.55 −0.22
TST AP to IP −0.82 0.44 −1.87 0.07 −0.59
RT IP to AP 0.34 0.15 2.33 0.03 0.79
RT AP to IP 0.21 0.09 2.32 0.03 0.78
RevT IP to AP 0.33 0.15 2.16 0.04 0.74
RevT AP to IP 0.16 0.10 1.67 0.11 0.58

Predictions of the switching scores from the three Stroop task conditions. Italic: signitificant results. TST, total switching time; RT, reaction time; RevT, reversal time; IP, in-phase; AP, anti-phase.