Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 24;58(3):e01699-19. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01699-19

TABLE 4.

Respective sensitivity and specificity of RDT by comparison to PCR as referenced in different studies of the literaturea

Reference and yr Type of RDT No. of CSF samples Origin of CSF samples Serogroup % Sensitivity (95%CI) % Specificity (95% CI)
(11) 2006 LA 484 Niger 2003 A 88 (85–91) 93 (90–95)
(12) 2009 LA 126 Niger 2006 A 69 (57–79) 81 (68–91)
Dipstick 89 (80–95) 62 (48–75)
(15) 2010 Dipstick 265 Burkina Faso 2007 A 70.0 (55.4–82.1) 97.0 (93.4–98.7)
(16) 2013 Dipstick 401 France, Burkina Faso, Niger A 88 (81–92) 99 (98–100)
(17) 2014 Dipstick 1,113b Niger 2008–2012 87.6 (85.7–89.3) 85.7 (83.1–87.2)
1,162c Niger 2008–2012 A/W 92.5 (89.8–92.9) 84.6 (82.0–86.9)
(18) 2015 Dipstick 369 Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Niger, France X 94 (86–98) 100 (99–100)
(13) 2016 LA 63 Nigeria 2013–2015 C 80.0 (65.4–90.4) 94.4 (72.7–99.9)
This study 2019 Dipstick 560 Niger, Côte d’Ivoire, République Centre-Africaine, Togo, France A 93.0 (79.9–98.1) 99.0 (97.6–99.6)
C 74.4 (59.4–85.6) 100 (99.0–100)
W 98.1 (94.2–99.5) 98.0 (96.0–99.0)
X 100 (92.3–100) 98.6 (97.6–99.4)
Y 83.3 (50.9–97.0) 100 (99.1–100)
a

RDT, rapid diagnostic test; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; LA, latex agglutination.

b

Tested in point of care.

c

Tested in reference laboratory.