Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 8;217(2):e20191009. doi: 10.1084/jem.20191009

Table 2. Comparison of clinical characteristics between CMR and non-CMR CML patients.

Clinical parameters CMR (n = 51) median (range) Non-CMR (n = 42) median (range) P values
Age (yr) 60.7 (28–85) 59.5 (23–79) 0.9446
Sex,a female 20 (39.2) 15 (35.7) 0.7287
Weight (kg) 60.3 (42–84) 60.7 (45–102) 0.3965
Sokal risk (low/int./high) 35/13/2 24/11/2 0.8688
EUTOS risk (low/high) 42/3 31/2 0.9140
CML duration (mo) 84.8 (22.4–229.4) 77.3 (13.2–186.3) 0.6576
Prior IFN-αa 8 (15.7) 11 (26.2) 0.2112
Duration of IM treatment (mo) 84.3 (22.4–116.6) 77.1 (12.6–122.4) 0.5036
Actual daily IM dose (mg/d) 400 (161.7–400) 400 (66.7–400) 0.9098
Median time to CCyR (mo)
From diagnosis to CCyR 6.6 (2.5–60.1) 6.5 (1–103.3) 0.8728
From IM therapy to CCyR 5.7 (2–46.5) 4.8 (0.5–76.7) 0.5431
Median time to MMR (mo)
From diagnosis to MMR 15.8 (4.4–185.6) 30.5 (4.4–167.8) 0.0937
From IM therapy to MMR 15.1 (3.2–76.1) 19.6 (3.6–93.9) 0.2429
IM trough concentration (ng/ml) 981.8 (336.3–2,687.7) 1151.7 (124.4–2,624.1) 0.5597
BIM deletiona 4 (7.8) 7 (16.6) 0.1898

BIM, BCL2L11 gene; CCyR, complete cytogenetic response; EUTOS, European Treatment and Outcome Study; IM, imatinib; int., intermediate; MMR, major molecular response.

a

Data presented as number (%) of patients.