Table 2. The effect of LDL-C on T2DM estimated using IVW and MR-Egger methods.
Method | Beta | Std error | 95% CI | P-value | |
IVW | 0.250 | 0.074 | 0.105 | 0.395 | 0.001 |
Penalized IVW | 0.250 | 0.074 | 0.105 | 0.395 | 0.001 |
Robust IVW | 0.240 | 0.078 | 0.087 | 0.393 | 0.002 |
Penalized robust IVW | 0.240 | 0.078 | 0.087 | 0.393 | 0.002 |
MR-Egger | 0.062 | 0.146 | -0.224 | 0.348 | 0.670 |
(intercept) | 0.011 | 0.007 | -0.003 | 0.025 | 0.135 |
Penalized MR-Egger | 0.062 | 0.146 | -0.224 | 0.348 | 0.670 |
(intercept) | 0.011 | 0.007 | -0.003 | 0.025 | 0.135 |
Robust MR-Egger | 0.070 | 0.078 | -0.082 | 0.222 | 0.367 |
(intercept) | 0.010 | 0.006 | -0.001 | 0.021 | 0.072 |
Penalized robust MR-Egger | 0.070 | 0.078 | -0.082 | 0.222 | 0.367 |
(intercept) | 0.010 | 0.006 | -0.001 | 0.021 | 0.072 |
CI, confidence intervals; IVW, inverse-variance weighted; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol;
OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error; T2DM, type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.