Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Soc Pers Relat. 2017 Jun 8;35(10):1319–1339. doi: 10.1177/0265407517712480

Table 2a.

Descriptive statistics by marital quality type: women.

Total Aversive Indifferent Ambivalent Supportive
Loneliness (scale:0–6)*** 0.93 1.81 1.34 0.77 0.50
 SD 0.06 0.14 0.17 0.10 0.06
Family quality (%)***
 Aversive 19.85 29.15 18.61 22.36 14.02
 Indifferent 31.44 27.96 52.61 25.60 30.72
 Ambivalent 16.05 19.11 7.45 22.62 13.06
 Supportive 32.66 23.77 21.32 29.41 42.2
Friendship quality (%)***
 Aversive 7.53 12.79 8.42 7.51 4.66
 Indifferent 62.22 62.26 72.90 64.40 57.94
 Ambivalent 3.62 2.83 2.68 7.93 1.74
 Supportive 26.63 22.11 15.99 20.15 35.67
Age 67.60 68.35 68.59 66.67 67.48
 SD 0.35 0.90 0.76 0.70 0.51
Number of ADL (scale: 0–7) 0.72 0.82 0.74 0.85 0.55
 SD 0.05 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.07
Network size 4.95 5.17 4.76 4.89 4.95
 SD 0.06 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.08
Household income (%)
 <25K 15.11 17.28 21.74 16.55 11.16
 25–50K 27.28 27.69 26.09 22.22 30.52
 50–100K 35.24 36.15 35.74 36.79 33.67
 >100K 22.37 18.87 16.43 24.44 24.64
Education (%)
 < HS 10.79 13.21 20.37 8.26 8.37
 HS/equiv 24.86 25.50 19.97 23.50 26.69
 Voc cert/some college/assoc 39.74 40.89 42.98 39.30 38.50
 Bachelor’s or more 24.62 20.41 16.68 28.93 26.44
Race/ethnicity (%)*
 White 83.79 78.99 81.61 80.85 88.65
 Black 6.34 11.09 3.99 7.71 3.69
 Hispanic 7.39 7.44 10.61 9.39 5.27
 Other 2.48 2.48 3.79 2.05 2.39

Notes:

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001 for significance tests across groups of different marriage types. Percentages for family and friendship quality, household income, education, or race/ethnicity may not add up to 100% due to rounding.