Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Soc Pers Relat. 2017 Jun 8;35(10):1319–1339. doi: 10.1177/0265407517712480

Table 2b.

Descriptive statistics by marital quality type: men.

Total Aversive Indifferent Ambivalent Supportive
Loneliness (scale:0–6)*** 0.84 1.56 0.74 0.79 0.57
 SD 0.06 0.13 0.20 0.09 0.10
Family quality (%)***
 Aversive 19.78 26.60 11.15 25.19 11.73
 Indifferent 52.18 53.05 69.21 44.55 56.52
 Ambivalent 7.14 9.07 2.17 11.44 2.23
 Supportive 20.90 11.28 17.47 18.82 29.52
Friendship quality (%)*
 Aversive 12.98 22.39 8.07 13.29 8.81
 Indifferent 70.88 69.97 81.24 65.63 74.87
 Ambivalent 1.64 1.04 0.00 2.49 1.38
 Supportive 14.50 6.60 10.69 18.59 14.94
Age 71.11 71.37 68.69 71.83 70.54
 SD 0.33 0.56 1.05 0.53 0.61
Number of ADL (scale: 0–7) 0.77 0.80 0.37 0.76 0.83
 SD 0.08 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.20
Network size 4.17 4.19 3.28 4.27 4.26
 SD 0.07 0.13 0.28 0.12 0.13
Household income (%)
 <25K 15.04 18.10 13.03 15.67 13.08
 25–50K 26.97 24.42 27.83 28.52 27.86
 50–100K 35.51 37.55 35.65 34.49 35.68
 >100K 22.48 19.94 23.49 21.32 23.39
Education (%)
 < HS 14.83 19.94 8.04 13.83 14.74
 HS/equiv 23.38 25.52 20.14 26.32 19.74
 Voc cert/some college/assoc 26.49 21.30 23.11 27.16 29.24
 Bachelor’s or more 35.31 33.24 48.70 32.69 36.27
Race/ethnicity (%)*
 White 83.90 79.26 90.01 81.44 87.68
 Black 6.31 11.87 4.00 6.27 3.94
 Hispanic 7.42 5.86 4.68 9.93 6.10
 Other 2.37 3.02 1.31 2.35 2.28

Notes:

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001 for significance tests across groups of different marriage types within each gender. Percentages for family and friendship quality, household income, education, or race/ethnicity may not add up to 100% due to rounding.