Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 15;25(2):85–92. doi: 10.12793/tcp.2017.25.2.85

Table 2. Assessment of dose-proportionality for pharmacokinetics of fluticasone, salmeterol, and tiotropium using power model regression.

Study drug Parameters Slope (95% confidence interval)
Fluticasone Cmax (pg/mL) 0.8584 (0.6458 – 1.0710)
AUClast (h*pg/mL) 0.8513 (0.6562 – 1.0463)
AUCinf (h*pg/mL) 0.8466 (0.6528 – 1.0403)
Salmeterol Cmax (pg/mL) 0.9410 (0.6467 – 1.2353)
AUClast (h*pg/mL) 1.2010 (0.9709 – 1.4311)
AUCinf (h*pg/mL) 1.1616 (0.9457 – 1.3776)
Tiotropium Cmax (pg/mL) 1.1452 (0.7355 – 1.5548)
AUC0-30min (h*pg/mL) 1.0674 (0.7143 – 1.4206)
AUClast (h*pg/mL) 2.1977 (1.6239 – 2.7716)
AUCinf (h*pg/mL) 2.7928 (1.8118 – 3.7739)

Power model: ln(Y) = (Intercept) + (Slope) × ln(Dose), Y: pharmacokinetic parameter. Cmax, maximum plasma concentration; AUClast, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last observed time point; AUCinf, AUC from time zero to infinity; AUC0-30min, AUC from time zero to 30 minute.