Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 13;120(3):603–612. doi: 10.1007/s00421-019-04297-1

Table 4.

Transfer function analysis of oscillations in mean arterial pressure and middle cerebral artery velocity using squat-stand manoeuvres

Healthy + CVD risk Normocapnia (n = 19; healthy = 11) Hypercapnia (n = 17; healthy = 11)
Sham RIPC P value Sham RIPC P value
PetCO2 (mmHg) 38.35 ± 2.65 38.15 ± 2.85 0.81 46.63 ± 2.74 46.46 ± 3.00 0.90
Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (0.10 Hz)
 MCAv power (cm/s)2 81.24 ± 54.43 80.95 ± 60.47 0.87 76.85 ± 40.04 82.82 ± 52.66 0.69
 MAP power (mmHg2) 108.83 ± 55.61 117.67 ± 72.05 0.73 110.81 ± 62.25 119.47 ± 88.78 0.74
 Normalised gain % 1.27 ± 0.25 1.22 ± 0.35 0.46 0.86 ± 0.16 0.94 ± 0.21 0.11
 Gain (cm/s/mmHg) 0.80 ± 0.17 0.75 ± 0.17 0.86 0.75 ± 0.16 0.80 ± 0.20 0.82
 Phase (radians) 0.53 ± 0.47 0.64 ± 0.39 0.53 0.38 ± 0.44 0.40 ± 0.31 0.90
 Coherence 0.64 ± 0.10 0.65 ± 0.10 0.59 0.60 ± 0.20 0.58 ± 0.11 0.45

Comparison between Sham and RIPC conditions with all participants grouped together

Values are means ± SD. Data are presented grouped (healthy and CVD risk) as there were no significant interactions between participant groups. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05

PetCO2 partial pressure of end tidal carbon dioxide, MCAv middle cerebral artery velocity, MAP, mean arterial pressure