Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 19;11:224. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00224

TABLE 4.

Differentially represented metabolites in Sco-trpMKI in comparison to Sco-EV.

Compound Differential abundance1 P (Student’s t-test) Functional classification2
Aspartic acid −3.23 2.76 × 10–2 Amino acid metabolism
Arginine −1.37 4.65 × 10–2
Phenylalanine −1.73 3.31 × 10–2
Tyrosine −1.53 2.45 × 10–6
Histidine NA NA
Glutamic acid −1.37 3.86 × 10–2
Glutamine −1.69 1.26 × 10–2

Glucosamine 6-phosphate −2.26 2.81 × 10–2 Glycolysis; Pentose phosphate pathway
3-phosphoglycerate −1.91 4.79 × 10–2
Fructose 6-phosphate −1.67 3.43 × 10–2
Glucose 6-phosphate −3.13 4.20 × 10–3
6-phosphogluconate −1.84 4.62 × 10–2

2-oxoglutarate −1.63 2.78 × 10–2 TCA cycle
Fumarate NA NA
Citrate −1.36 4.20 × 10–2
Methylmalonate 1.70 4.91 × 10–2
Succinate 1.72 4.59 × 10–2
Malate −1.90 4.21 × 10–2
Oxalate NA NA

AMP NA NA Nucleotide metabolism
CMP −2.97 2.33 × 10–2
UMP −3.37 4.64 × 10–3
Uracil −2.15 4.91 × 10–2
GMP NA NA
Inosine 2.04 4.54 × 10–2
Guanosine −1.34 1.41 × 10–2

1Positive and negative values stand for up- and down-representation in Sco-trpMKI, respectively. NA, not applicable. 2Functional classification is based on KEGG orthology.