Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 13;5(2):e002149. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002149

Table 4.

Determinants of utility: alternative specific logistic regression

Outcome: facility choice T statistics
Distance to facility (km) −0.38*** −15.44
Nearest facility to women 0.52*** 4.68
Facility type (ref=hospital)
Health centre 2.51*** 4.28
Dispensaries −4.08*** −3.93
Range of family planning commodities available at facility 0.75** 3.13
Range of other health services offered at facility −1.79*** −6.34
Follow-up for family planning services offered at facility (ref=no) 0.62 0.29
Fees for family planning services at facility (ref=no) −3.36*** −3.18
Stock out of family planning commodities −4.26*** −3.27

Output for coefficients of women-level characteristics (age, education, marital status and wealth) are not shown butwere included in the analysis.

*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001