Table 1.
Results of two‐way ANOVA testing the effects of warming, acidification, and their interaction on the average densities of zooplankton and phytoplankton groups
| Warming | Acidification | Warming × Acidification | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | p | F | p | F | p | |
| Top predator | 110.76 | <.001 | 0.413 | .745 | 0.927 | .493 |
| Mesopredator | 9.15 | <.001 | 0.685 | .57 | 1.64 | .179 |
| Herbivore | 63.97 | <.001 | 7.03 | .002 | 2.14 | .086 |
| Omnivore | 80.72 | <.001 | 0.945 | .435 | 0.781 | .593 |
| Detritivore | 50.05 | <.001 | 0.761 | .527 | 4.2 | .005 |
| Total zooplankton | 61.32 | <.001 | 0.226 | .877 | 3.24 | .018 |
| Green algae | 4.83 | .017 | 9.03 | <.001 | 5.29 | <.001 |
| Cyanobacteria | 6.29 | .006 | 1.05 | .39 | 1.77 | .147 |
| Diatom | 35.99 | <.001 | 6.36 | .003 | 5.75 | <.001 |
| Cryptophyta | 4.82 | .017 | 5.94 | .028 | 0.635 | .7 |
| Total phytoplankton | 1.08 | .357 | 3.08 | .047 | 2.018 | .103 |
All densities were log (x + 1)‐transformed for the analyses. Significant effects (p < .05) are in bold.