Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 4.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2020 Feb 4;65(3):035013. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab63bb

Table 1.

Numerical comparison of DAUNet trained and tested on sMRI (DSUNet sMRI), DAUNet trained and tested on CBCT (DSUNet CBCT), and DSUNet trained and tested on sMRI (DSUNet sMRI) for five-fold cross-validation.

Method DSC Sensitivity Specificity HD (mm) MSD (mm) RMSD (mm) CMD (mm) VD (cc)
Bladder DSUNet sMRI 0.93±0.04 0.95±0.032 0.91±0.07 5.91±4.90 0.52±0.29 0.85±0.62 1.25±1.00 9.17±6.30
DAUNet CBCT 0.91±0.06 0.96±0.048 0.87±0.08 12.79±14.82 0.67±0.33 1.07±0.64 1.4±1.49 16.57±18.61
DAUNet sMRI 0.94±0.02 0.94±0.04 0.96±0.02 4.58±3.94 0.48±0.23 0.83±0.63 0.93±0.74 6.92±5.71
P-value DAUNet sMRI vs. DSUNet sMRI 0.174 0.022 0.003 0.021 0.591 0.922 0.014 0.195
P-value DAUNet sMRI vs. DAUNet CBCT 0.004 0.002 <0.001 <0.001 0.002 0.019 0.005 0.007

Prostate DSUNet sMRI 0.83±0.045 0.83±0.091 0.86±0.091 6.42±2.46 0.91±0.26 1.28±0.34 2.48±1.11 6.39±7.29
DAUNet CBCT 0.80±0.05 0.80±0.10 0.81±0.08 6.82±3.088 1.06±0.29 1.48±0.48 3.22±1.30 5.65±6.80
DAUNet sMRI 0.86±0.04 0.86±0.06 0.87±0.09 5.36±2.46 0.76±0.26 1.14±0.36 1.98±1.14 3.22±2.55
P-value DAUNet sMRI vs. DSUNet sMRI 0.002 0.541 0.074 0.065 0.017 0.091 0.147 0.049
P-value DAUNet sMRI vs. DAUNet CBCT <0.001 0.010 0.043 0.034 <0.001 0.006 <0.001 0.103

Rectum DSUNet sMRI 0.86±0.042 0.85±0.07 0.89±0.07 9.96±5.52 1.32±2.27 2.63±5.17 4.83±4.99 7.14±9.95
DAUNet CBCT 0.83±0.055 0.81±0.098 0.87±0.07 15.51±22.13 1.40±1.06 3.07±3.21 5.28±5.88 9.60±8.96
DAUNet sMRI 0.92±0.03 0.91±0.02 0.93±0.02 5.20±1.61 0.62±0.15 1.24±1.01 1.94±1.29 3.70±4.18
P-value DAUNet sMRI vs. DSUNet sMRI <0.001 0.002 0.042 <0.001 0.128 0.161 0.007 0.065
P-value DAUNet sMRI vs. DAUNet CBCT <0.001 <0.001 0.007 0.031 <0.001 0.004 0.009 0.001