Table 3.
Numerical comparison of DSUNet sMRI, DSUNet CBCT, and DSUNet sMRI on 100 patients.
Method | DSC | Sensitivity | Specificity | HD (mm) | MSD (mm) | RMSD (mm) | CMD (mm) | VD (cc) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bladder | DSUNet sMRI | 0.93±0.05 | 0.96±0.03 | 0.91±0.07 | 6.45±5.24 | 0.51±0.27 | 0.81±0.52 | 1.29±1.28 | 8.642±7.23 |
DAUNet CBCT | 0.90±0.06 | 0.93±0.08 | 0.88±0.08 | 11.31±12.75 | 0.74±0.44 | 1.18±0.76 | 2.08±2.29 | 14.26±16.59 | |
DAUNet sMRI | 0.95±0.02 | 0.95±0.04 | 0.95±0.03 | 4.69±4.92 | 0.44±0.22 | 0.80±0.69 | 0.90±0.68 | 6.55±6.68 | |
P-value DAUNet sMRI vs. DSUNet sMRI | 0.003 | 0.180 | <0.001 | 0.049 | 0.154 | 0.960 | 0.023 | 0.096 | |
P-value DAUNet sMRI vs. DAUNet CBCT | <0.001 | 0.169 | <0.001 | 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.009 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
Prostate | DSUNet sMRI | 0.84±0.07 | 0.85±0.10 | 0.84±0.096 | 5.48±2.57 | 0.80±0.35 | 1.12±0.47 | 2.26±1.63 | 4.13±5.71 |
DAUNet CBCT | 0.82±0.09 | 0.81±0.10 | 0.84±0.11 | 5.83±3.30 | 0.9±0.47 | 1.30±0.66 | 2.58±1.92 | 3.98±5.21 | |
DAUNet sMRI | 0.86±0.06 | 0.86±0.08 | 0.87±0.085 | 4.82±2.37 | 0.73±0.37 | 1.08±0.55 | 1.954±1.58 | 3.32±5.54 | |
P-value DAUNet sMRI vs. DSUNet sMRI | <0.001 | 0.268 | 0.120 | 0.043 | 0.126 | 0.584 | 0.179 | 0.317 | |
P-value DAUNet sMRI vs. DAUNet CBCT | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.084 | 0.010 | <0.001 | 0.009 | 0.031 | 0.403 | |
Rectum | DSUNet sMRI | 0.88±0.05 | 0.88±0.07 | 0.88±0.08 | 8.62±5.15 | 1.03±1.66 | 2.04±3.82 | 3.72±4.18 | 5.31±7.78 |
DAUNet CBCT | 0.83±0.07 | 0.84±0.11 | 0.84±0.08 | 13.14±18.71 | 1.19±0.87 | 2.31±2.51 | 3.92±4.65 | 8.32±8.47 | |
DAUNet sMRI | 0.91±0.04 | 0.92±0.04 | 0.90±0.05 | 5.46±3.19 | 0.71±0.65 | 1.62±2.36 | 1.98±1.86 | 3.93±3.86 | |
P-value DAUNet sMRI vs. DSUNet sMRI | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.014 | <0.001 | 0.192 | 0.434 | 0.002 | 0.155 | |
P-value DAUNet sMRI vs. DAUNet CBCT | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 0.130 | 0.005 | <0.001 |