Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 4.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2020 Feb 4;65(3):035013. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab63bb

Table 3.

Numerical comparison of DSUNet sMRI, DSUNet CBCT, and DSUNet sMRI on 100 patients.

Method DSC Sensitivity Specificity HD (mm) MSD (mm) RMSD (mm) CMD (mm) VD (cc)
Bladder DSUNet sMRI 0.93±0.05 0.96±0.03 0.91±0.07 6.45±5.24 0.51±0.27 0.81±0.52 1.29±1.28 8.642±7.23
DAUNet CBCT 0.90±0.06 0.93±0.08 0.88±0.08 11.31±12.75 0.74±0.44 1.18±0.76 2.08±2.29 14.26±16.59
DAUNet sMRI 0.95±0.02 0.95±0.04 0.95±0.03 4.69±4.92 0.44±0.22 0.80±0.69 0.90±0.68 6.55±6.68
P-value DAUNet sMRI vs. DSUNet sMRI 0.003 0.180 <0.001 0.049 0.154 0.960 0.023 0.096
P-value DAUNet sMRI vs. DAUNet CBCT <0.001 0.169 <0.001 0.002 <0.001 0.009 <0.001 <0.001

Prostate DSUNet sMRI 0.84±0.07 0.85±0.10 0.84±0.096 5.48±2.57 0.80±0.35 1.12±0.47 2.26±1.63 4.13±5.71
DAUNet CBCT 0.82±0.09 0.81±0.10 0.84±0.11 5.83±3.30 0.9±0.47 1.30±0.66 2.58±1.92 3.98±5.21
DAUNet sMRI 0.86±0.06 0.86±0.08 0.87±0.085 4.82±2.37 0.73±0.37 1.08±0.55 1.954±1.58 3.32±5.54
P-value DAUNet sMRI vs. DSUNet sMRI <0.001 0.268 0.120 0.043 0.126 0.584 0.179 0.317
P-value DAUNet sMRI vs. DAUNet CBCT <0.001 <0.001 0.084 0.010 <0.001 0.009 0.031 0.403

Rectum DSUNet sMRI 0.88±0.05 0.88±0.07 0.88±0.08 8.62±5.15 1.03±1.66 2.04±3.82 3.72±4.18 5.31±7.78
DAUNet CBCT 0.83±0.07 0.84±0.11 0.84±0.08 13.14±18.71 1.19±0.87 2.31±2.51 3.92±4.65 8.32±8.47
DAUNet sMRI 0.91±0.04 0.92±0.04 0.90±0.05 5.46±3.19 0.71±0.65 1.62±2.36 1.98±1.86 3.93±3.86
P-value DAUNet sMRI vs. DSUNet sMRI <0.001 <0.001 0.014 <0.001 0.192 0.434 0.002 0.155
P-value DAUNet sMRI vs. DAUNet CBCT <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.006 0.001 0.130 0.005 <0.001