. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2019 Oct 31;46(12):5612–5622. doi: 10.1002/mp.13854

Table 3:

DSC segmentation accuracies achieved using MABAS scheme versus various prior H&N segmentation methods in literature. Methods that report results using the publicly available PDDCA dataset are marked with an *.

Prior Methods	OAR	Dice Similarity Coefficient
Prior Methods	OAR	Prior Method	MABAS
Duc et al.¹¹	Cord	0.76	0.84
	Parotids	0.65	0.77
	Brainstem	0.83	0.76
	OpticNerves	0.55	0.38
La Macchia et al.²⁵ using MiM software	Cord	0.81	0.84
	Mandible	0.86	0.87
	Brainstem	0.81	0.76
	Parotids	0.79	0.77
Ibragimov et al.⁶	Parotids	0.77	0.77
	Cord	0.87	0.84
	Mandible	0.91	0.87
Ren et al.*²⁴	Chiasm	0.58	0.33
Ren et al.*²⁴	OpticNerves	0.71	0.38