Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 19;11:119. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00119

TABLE 2.

Relative abundance of epithelial microbiota during SARAI and SARAII identified to 97% at the phyla level of taxonomic classification using the RDP SILVA database (v128).

Treatment1
P-value
Phyla CON PHY AY SEM Additive
Actinobacteria 11.3 10.0 7.1 1.24 0.62
Bacteroidetes 1.73 1.95 0.80 0.353 0.12
Chloroflexi 0.006a 0.049b 0.021a 0.0127 0.02
Elusimicrobia 0.040 0.032 0.022 0.0051 0.65
Euryarchaeota 0.167 0.232 0.145 0.0259 0.38
Firmicutes 50.1 45.1 50.2 1.66 0.39
GN02 0.002a 0.031b 0.005a 0.0090 0.02
Planctomycetes 0.014 0.034 0.008 0.0078 0.08
Proteobacteria 35.5 41.1 40.5 1.77 0.48
Spirochaetes 0.008 0.012 0.002 0.0030 0.57
Synergistetes 0.64 0.92 0.68 0.086 0.30
Tenericutes 0.09 0.08 0.29 0.067 0.10
TM7 0.22 0.22 0.15 0.023 0.57
Verrucomicrobia 0.017 0.015 0.001 0.0051 0.54
WPS2 0.000 0.000 0.006 0.0019 0.39

SEM, standard error of the mean. P-value additive is based on the fixed effects ANOVA model using the Tukey–Kramer method. 1Treatment is the additive that was added to SARA diets; CON: control, no supplementation; PHY: phytogenic product; AY: autolyzed yeast. a,bDiffering superscripts in the same row indicate significant variation in comparison to the control group based on Dunnett-Hsu analysis.