Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 24;2013(6):CD000493. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000493.pub2

Comparison 14. Danxiaoling versus Yiganling.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Pruritus 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Any improvement after treatment 1 58 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.0 [0.94, 1.07]
1.2 Marked improvement after treatment 1 58 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.67 [1.14, 2.44]
2 Stillbirths/neonatal deaths 1 58 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Bile acid levels (CGA) 1 58 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐3.83 [‐22.59, 14.93]
4 ALT 1 54 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 5.20 [‐36.90, 47.30]
5 Caesarean section 1 58 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.6 [0.16, 2.28]
6 Meconium‐stained liquor 1 58 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.4 [0.18, 0.89]
7 Spontaneous birth at less than 37 weeks 1 58 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.04, 3.02]