Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD000494. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000494.pub4

Comparison 14. Intramuscular prostaglandin versus rectal misoprostol.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Postpartum haemorrhage (>= 500 mL) 1 120 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.75 [0.18, 3.21]
1.1 400 mcg 1 120 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.75 [0.18, 3.21]
2 Blood loss (mL) 1 120 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐40.0 [‐99.66, 19.66]
2.1 400 mcg 1 120 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐40.0 [‐99.66, 19.66]
3 Use of additional uterotonics 1 120 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.2 [0.05, 0.87]
3.1 400 mcg 1 120 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.2 [0.05, 0.87]
4 Blood transfusion 1 120 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.01, 8.02]
4.1 400 mcg 1 120 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.01, 8.02]
5 Any shivering 1 120 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.09 [0.01, 1.61]
5.1 400 mcg 1 120 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.09 [0.01, 1.61]