Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD000494. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000494.pub4

Comparison 20. Rectal misoprostol versus intramuscular prostaglandin (subgroups by dose).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Postpartum haemorrhage (>= 500 mL) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 600 mcg 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.2 400 mcg 1 120 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.33 [0.31, 5.70]
2 Blood loss (mL) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 600 mcg 0 0 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.2 400 mcg 1 120 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 40.0 [‐19.66, 99.66]
3 Use of additional uterotonics 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 600 mcg 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.2 400 mcg 1 120 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 5.0 [1.14, 21.86]