Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD000494. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000494.pub4

Colombia 2002.

Methods Method of random allocation not stated. No placebo use or blinding of outcome assessments
Participants 75 women with vaginal delivery in Colombia. Exclusion criteria: asthma, coagulopathy, twins, stillbirth, lacerations, and "amniotic fluid in the blood collection".
Interventions Misoprostol 50 mcg sublingually after cord clamp vs oxytocin 16 m IU per minute intravenously after cord clamp vs methylergometrine 0.2 mg after placenta delivery.
Outcomes Blood loss, side‐effects, cost. 
 Method of collection or estimation of blood loss not stated.
Notes Management of third stage: no mention of third stage management technique. 
 No reported postrandomisation exclusions or loss to follow‐up. Analysis was based on the total population of 75 women.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of random allocation not stated.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No mention of how the concealment occurred.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No placebo use or blinding of outcome assessments.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No loss to follow‐up and postrandomisation exclusions have been reported.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Primary outcomes of the review have been reported.
Other bias Low risk The characteristics of the 2 groups have been comparable.