Skip to main content
. 2004 Oct 18;2004(4):CD000483. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000483.pub2

Comparison 3. Secondary ischaemia.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 clinical signs of secondary ischaemia 2 114 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.08 [0.54, 2.16]
1.1 treatment started before occlusion of the aneurysm 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.2 treatment started after occlusion of the aneurysm 2 114 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.08 [0.54, 2.16]
2 infarct on CT/MR 1 82 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.75 [0.55, 5.53]
2.1 treatment started before occlusion of the aneurysm 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.2 treatment started after occlusion of the aneurysm 1 82 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.75 [0.55, 5.53]