Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 26.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Dec 1;68(2):109–111. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600475

TABLE 1.

Pay-for-performance measures and outcome direction in 15 reviewed studies

Measure Reference and outcomea
Patient level
 Received threshold dose of treatment 2 (+), 11 (+), 6 (−, /)
 Length of stay 10 (+), 6 (−)
 Likelihood of having early follow-up 15 (+)
 Likelihood of having a psychiatric consultation 15 (+)
 Service use 11 (+), 4 (−)
 Program completion 11 (+), 12 (/), 6 (−, /)
 Treatment initiation 3 (+)
 Successfully completed detoxification and then received residential or outpatient treatment 12 (+)
 Treatment effectiveness 5 (+), 2 (/)
Clinician level
 Intentions to achieve target threshold in EBP implementationb 1 (+)
 Treatment competence 1 (+), 2 (+)
 Client retention 13 (+), 14 (+)
 Referrals 8 (+)
 Matching between illness severity and treatment intensity 8 (+)
Organization level
 Waiting time 10 (+), 6 (/)
 Participation in quality improvement initiatives 10 (+)
 Occupancy 12 (+)
 Program efficiency 5 (+)
a

(+),outcome in incentivized direction; (−), outcome opposite to incentivized direction; (/), no change in outcome

b

EBP, evidence-based practice