. 2020 Feb 10;5(3):455–464. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0656-6

Table 2.

Predicted phenotypes of N. gonorrhoeae for database isolates (a) and non-database isolates (b)

(a) Database isolates
Sample	Lineage confidently detected	Matched k-mers (%)	Antibiogram AZM		Antibiogram CFM		Antibiogram CIP		Antibiogram CRO		MLST match
Sample	Lineage confidently detected	Matched k-mers (%)	Actual	Best match	Actual	Best match	Actual	Best match	Actual	Best match	MLST match
GC01	Yes	27	S	S^a	S	S^a	S	S^a	S	S^a	Yes^a
GC02	Yes	27	S	S^a	R	R^a,c	S	S^a	R	R^a,c	Yes^a
GC03	Yes	33	S	S^a	R	S^b,c	S	S^a	R	S^b,c	Yes^a
GC04	Yes	21	S	S^a	R	R^a	R	R^a	R	S^b	Yes^a
GC05	Yes	7	R	R^a	S	S^a	S	S^a	S	S^a	Yes^a

(b) Non-database isolates
Sample	Lineage confidently detected	Matched k-mers (%)	Antibiogram AZM		Antibiogram CFM		Antibiogram CIP		Antibiogram CRO
Sample	Lineage confidently detected	Matched k-mers (%)	Actual	Best match	Actual	Best match	Actual	Best match	Actual	Best match
GC06	Yes	19	S	S^a	R	R^a	R	R^a	S	S^a
GC07	No	20	S	S^a	S	S^a	R	R^a	S	S^a
GC08	No	19	S	S^a	S	S^a	R	R^a	S	S^a
GC09	No	18	S	S^a	S	S^a	S	S^a	S	S^a
GC10	No	20	S	S^a	S	S^a	R	R^a	S	S^a
GC11	No	20	S	S^a	S	S^a	R	R^a	S	S^a
GC12	No	20	S	S^a	S	S^a	R	R^a	S	S^a
GC13	Yes	20	S	S^a	S	S^a	R	R^a	S	S^a
GC14	Yes	19	S	S^a	S	S^a	R	R^a	S	S^a
GC15	Yes	19	R	S^b,c	S	S^a	S	S^a	S	S^a
GC16	No	18	S	S^a	S	S^a,c	R	R^a	S	S^a,c
GC17	No	19	S	S^a	S	S^a,c	R	R^a	S	S^a,c
GC18	No	20	S	S^a	S	S^a	R	R^a	S	S^a
GC19	Yes	18	S	S^a	S	S^a	R	R^a	S	S^a

The table displays actual and predicted resistance phenotypes (S and R) for individual experiments and information on the match of the predicted MLST-identified sequence type.

^aCorrect prediction.

^bIncorrect prediction.

^cLow-confidence call. AZM, azithromycin; CFM, cefixime; CIP, ciprofloxacin.