Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 26;10:3498. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59006-2

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Accuracy of consensus trees produced by GraPhyC, for which we used trees produced by CloneFinder, MACHINA, TreeOmics, and LICHeE. Average MLTED (a), TreeVec (b), and RF (c) scores of GraphyC across datasets are shown together with the average scores from the use of CloneFinder, MACHINA, TreeOmics, and LICHeE separately (“Mean”). MA datasets were used. Error bars indicate single standard deviations. GraPhyC results are from applying the “path” option, but the other three options (“ancestor-descendant”, “clonal”, and “parent-child”) produced very similar results.