Table 3.
Descriptives and test statistics for simple comparisons between individuals with recreational–occasional, recreational–frequent, and unregulated Internet pornography use
| (1) Recreational–occasional use (N = 333) | (2) Recreational–frequent use (N = 394) | (3) Unregulated use (N = 225) | F (2, 946) | Partial η2 | 1 vs. 2 | 1 vs. 3 | 2 vs. 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M (SD) | M (SD) | M (SD) | p | Cohen’s d | p | Cohen’s d | p | Cohen’s d | |||
| BIS-15 | |||||||||||
| Non-planning | 11.13 (3.32) | 11.41 (3.34) | 11.71 (3.65) | 0.68ab | 0.001 | >.999 | 0.08 | .772 | 0.17 | >.999 | 0.09 |
| Motor | 10.69 (3.01) | 10.80 (3.06) | 11.44 (3.46) | 1.43bc | 0.003 | >.999 | 0.04 | .277 | 0.23 | >.999 | 0.20 |
| Attentional | 9.51 (2.79) | 9.51 (2.71) | 11.31 (2.77) | 26.54bc** | 0.053 | >.999 | 0.00 | <.001 | 0.65 | <.001 | 0.66 |
| Delay discounting | −4.88 (1.77) | −4.60 (1.67) | −4.38 (1.59) | 3.49bc* | 0.007 | .172 | 0.16 | .037 | 0.29 | >.999 | 0.13 |
| REI | |||||||||||
| Faith in intuition | 4.38 (0.85) | 4.33 (0.93) | 4.52 (0.96) | 1.40b c | 0.003 | >.999 | −0.06 | .843 | 0.16 | .284 | 0.20 |
| Need for cognition | 5.11 (1.04) | 5.14 (1.03) | 4.74 (1.25) | 7.66ab* | 0.016 | >.999 | 0.03 | .003 | −0.33 | .001 | −0.36 |
| Baseline craving | 21.88 (6.86) | 25.71 (6.26) | 34.20 (5.32) | 237.98bc** | 0.335 | <.001 | 0.59 | <.001 | 1.96 | <.001 | 1.43 |
| Attitude toward IP | 3.63 (0.91) | 4.23 (0.82) | 3.92 (1.28) | 34.09abc** | 0.067 | <.001 | 0.70 | .013 | 0.27 | <.001 | −0.31 |
| Coping style | |||||||||||
| Functional | 2.62 (0.53) | 2.50 (0.58) | 2.36 (0.55) | 11.56ab** | 0.024 | .042 | −0.22 | <.001 | −0.48 | .015 | −0.25 |
| Dysfunctional | 1.65 (0.49) | 1.68 (0.52) | 1.95 (0.57) | 15.75ab** | 0.032 | >.999 | 0.06 | <.001 | 0.57 | <.001 | 0.50 |
Note. BIS-15: Barratt Impulsiveness Scale; IP: Internet pornography; REI: Rational–Experiential Inventory; M: mean; SD: standard deviation.
aSignificant effect of covariate (age). bSignificant effect of covariate (relationship status). cSignificant effect of covariate (s-IAT anchor sum score).
*p < .05. **p < .001.