Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 20;8(3):586–602. doi: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.53

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics for the four clusters

Variable Cluster 1 (N = 901, 22.31%) avid binge-watchers Cluster 2 (N = 1,060, 26.24%) recreational TV series viewers Cluster 3 (N = 952, 23.57%) unregulated binge-watchers Cluster 4 (N = 1,126, 27.88%) regulated binge-watchers F p η2
Cluster profile Range M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD)
Social motive 1–4 2.26 (0.51)a,b,c 1.44 (0.40)b,c,d 1.72 (0.47)a,d 1.66 (0.46)a,d 536.81 <.001 .28
Emotional enhancement motive 1–4 3.52 (0.35)a,b,c 2.70 (0.44)b,c,d 3.31 (0.41)a,d 3.28 (0.37)a,d 796.14 <.001 .37
Enrichment motive 1–4 3.33 (0.41)a,b,c 2.54 (0.55)b,c,d 2.85 (0.51)a,c,d 3.03 (0.48)a,b,d 442.65 <.001 .25
Coping-escapism motive 1–4 2.85 (0.52)a,c 1.97 (0.44)b,c,d 2.80 (0.51)a,c 2.43 (0.50)a,b,d 688.35 <.001 .34
Negative urgency 1–4 2.62 (0.66)a,b,c 2.17 (0.61)b,c,d 2.92 (0.68)a,c,d 1.76 (0.53)a,b,d 692.75 <.001 .34
Positive urgency 1–4 2.97 (0.51)a,b,c 2.58 (0.50)b,c,d 3.17 (0.48)a,c,d 2.18 (0.48)a,b,d 814.54 <.001 .38
Lack of premeditation 1–4 1.75 (0.46)a,b,c 1.98 (0.53)b,c,d 2.44 (0.54)a,c,d 1.60 (0.45)a,b,d 537.28 <.001 .28
Lack of perseverance 1–4 1.70 (0.55)a,b 1.80 (0.56)b,d 2.39 (0.65)a,c,d 1.74 (0.58)b 288.69 <.001 .18
Sensation seeking 1–4 2.87 (0.62)a,b,c 2.58 (0.68)c,d 2.62 (0.68)c,d 2.20 (0.66)a,b,d 176.72 <.001 .12
Emotional reactivity 1–5 3.12 (0.75)a,b,c 2.39 (0.69)b,d 3.33 (0.75)a,c,d 2.39 (0.69)b,d 470.64 <.001 .26
External correlates
Age 18–69 23.23 (6.11)a,c 26.77 (8.88)b,c,d 23.80 (6.84)a,c 25.41 (7.46)a,b,d 45.89 <.001 .03
Gender 1–2 1.81 (0.39)a,b 1.75 (0.43)b,d 1.87 (0.34)a,c,d 1.79 (0.41)b 13.78 <.001 .01
Educational level 1–3 2.80 (0.40)a,c 2.85 (0.36)d 2.83 (0.37) 2.85 (0.36)d 3.98 .008 .00
Marital status 1–4 1.55 (0.78)a,c 1.79 (0.98)b,c,d 1.54 (0.75)a,c 1.68 (0.91)a,b,d 18.21 <.001 .01
Viewing frequency 1–4 3.31 (0.72)a,c 3.06 (0.79)b,c,d 3.28 (0.73)a 3.22 (0.73)a,d 23.16 <.001 .02
Hours/working day 0–6 2.61 (1.66)a,c 2.12 (1.51)b,c,d 2.65 (1.63)a,c 2.32 (1.58)a,b,d 24.52 <.001 .02
Hours/day off 0–6 3.93 (1.65)a,c 3.11 (1.66)b,c,d 3.96 (1.68)a,c 3.51 (1.66)a,b,d 58.99 <.001 .04
Number of episodes 1–7 3.87 (1.82)a,c 3.36 (1.72)b,c,d 3.97 (1.77)a,c 3.58 (1.71)a,b,d 25.27 <.001 .02
Number of TV shows watched simultaneously 1–7 4.84 (2.02)a,b 4.02 (2.08)b,c,d 4.46 (2.05)a,d 4.62 (2.05)a 28.91 <.001 .02
Self-perceived dependency 0–3 1.76 (1.01)a,c 1.00 (0.89)b,c,d 1.69 (1.04)a,c 1.36 (1.01)a,b,d 125.18 <.001 .08
Problematic consumption 0–3 0.47 (0.78)a,b,c 0.21 (0.56)b,d 0.61 (0.90)a,c,d 0.29 (0.62)b,d 64.45 <.001 .05
Willingness to change 0–1 0.09 (0.29)b 0.10 (0.30)b 0.15 (0.36)a,c,d 0.09 (0.28)b 8.97 <.001 .01
TV series-watching engagement 1–4 2.69 (0.58)a,b,c 2.11 (0.52)b,c,d 2.49 (0.54)a,c,d 2.42 (0.55)a,b,d 190.65 <.001 .12
TV series-watching-related positive emotions 1–4 3.05 (0.42)a,b,c 2.60 (0.45)b,c,d 2.94 (0.42)a,c,d 2.83 (0.46)a,b,d 187.29 <.001 .12
TV series-watching desire-savoring 1–4 3.36 (0.47)a,b,c 2.77 (0.56)b,c,d 3.27 (0.50)a,c,d 3.05 (0.54)a,b,d 252.03 <.001 .16
TV series-watching pleasure preservation 1–4 2.60 (0.77)a,b,c 2.09 (0.71)b,c,d 2.41 (0.73)a,c,d 2.28 (0.77)a,b,c 83.62 <.001 .06
Binge-watching 1–4 2.73 (0.59)a,c 2.20 (0.57)b,c,d 2.75 (0.60)a,c 2.41 (0.59)a,b,d 206.66 <.001 .13
TV series-watching loss of control 1–4 2.12 (0.65)a,b,c 1.70 (0.54)b,c,d 2.20 (0.66)a,c,d 1.80 (0.57)a,b,d 162.51 <.001 .11
TV series-watching dependency 1–4 1.89 (0.64)a,b,c 1.36 (0.38)b,c,d 1.82 (0.59)a,c,d 1.54 (0.51)a,b,d 209.64 <.001 .13
Negative affect 1–5 2.53 (0.65)a,b,c 2.06 (0.60)b,d 2.73 (0.70)a,c,d 2.13 (0.61)b,d 247.97 <.001 .16
Positive affect 1–5 3.49 (0.52)a,b,c 3.38 (0.53)b,d 3.19 (0.56)a,c,d 3.36 (0.52)b,d 49.42 <.001 .04
Compulsive Internet use 1–5 2.73 (0.75)a,b,c 2.17 (0.68)b,c,d 2.86 (0.75)a,c,d 2.30 (0.71)a,b,d 204.55 <.001 .14
Alcohol-related problems 0–40 5.52 (4.88)b,c 5.65 (4.64)b,c 6.77 (5.35)a,c,d 4.54 (3.90)a,b,d 36.87 <.001 .03

Note. aStatistically significant in comparison to cluster 2 (p < .05). bStatistically significant in comparison to cluster 3 (p < .05). cStatistically significant in comparison to cluster 4 (p < .05). dStatistically significant in comparison to cluster 1 (p < .05).