Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 23;10(1):e034832. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034832

Table 4.

Regression models to be fitted

Model Exposure Outcome* Adjustment(s) Interpretation
1 AAFI Life expectancy Nil Primary evaluation of austerity hypothesis.
2 Real per capita government expenditure Life expectancy Nil Sensitivity analysis 1 using alternative austerity measure.
3 Public social spending Life expectancy Nil Sensitivity analysis 2 using alternative austerity measure.
4 Cyclically adjusted primary balance Life expectancy Nil Sensitivity analysis 3 using alternative austerity measure.
5–8 As per models 1–4 Mortality rates Nil Evaluation of austerity hypotheses across primary and alternative measures using mortality rate outcome.
9–12 As per models 1–4 Underemployment Nil Impact of austerity on underemployment.
13–16 As per models 1–4 Mean household income Nil Impact of austerity on mean household income.
17–20 As per models 1–4 Life expectancy GDP per capita Impact of austerity after accounting for recession, but noting the potential for austerity to cause recession.
21–24 As per models 1–4 Life expectancy Underemployment Estimate of the mediating role of underemployment.
25–28 As per models 1–4 Life expectancy Mean household income Estimate of the mediating role of household incomes.
29–32 As per models 1–4 Life expectancy Nil Sensitivity analyses changing lag time to 0 years.
33–36 As per models 1–4 Life expectancy Nil Sensitivity analyses changing lag time to 5 years.
37–40 As per models 1–4 Life expectancy Nil Sensitivity analyses limiting the impacts to 2 years after the austerity measure returns to baseline.

*Life expectancy will be calculated for the total population and separately for men and women. The mortality rates will be age standardised for the total population, separately for men and women, and for separate age strata.

AAFI, Alesina-Ardagna Fiscal Index; GDP, gross domestic product.