Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 19;10(1):e030110. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030110

Table 3.

Sensitivity analysis: cost-effectiveness of the 3D approach from an NHS/PSS perspective based on complete cases only

Usual care
mean (SE)
n=592 complete cases
Intervention
mean (SE)
n=599 complete cases
Incremental difference (95% CI)
Costs (£)
 Unadjusted costs from the NHS/PSS perspective 4916 (290) 4757 (222)
 Adjusted costs from the NHS/PSS perspective 4905 (258) 4768 (256) −137 (−852 to 577)
Outcomes
 Unadjusted QALYs over 15 months of follow-up 0.698 (0.014) 0.750 (0.013)
 Adjusted QALYs over 15 months of follow-up 0.722 (0.005) 0.726 (0.005) 0.004 (−0.010 to 0.019)
Cost-effectiveness statistics
ICER: Intervention dominates
Net monetary benefit at £20,000: £222 (−584 to 1028).

Cost estimates were adjusted for randomisation variables; QALY estimates were adjusted for randomisation variables and baseline utility.

CI, confidence interval; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; NHS, National Health Service; PSS, personal social services; QALY, quality-adjusted life year; SE, standard error.