Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 12;10(1):e033227. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033227

Table 5.

Reactions to the intervention and related quotes

Complexity Relevance Valence Involvement Novelty
Group 1 9.15 9.35 9.15 8.85 7.85
Group 2 8.52 9.06 8.63 8.56 7.09
Difference t(30)=0.99 t(30)=0.58 t(30)=0.90 t(30)=0.55 t(30)=1.63
Interview quotes
 Quote 1 ID7: What has been the best, and most beneficial, for me was to be very concrete. Often when participating in various kinds of education programs, you get a theoretical top-up in some way, and then there is usually another step where you as a participant need to think about how to work with this in your practice alone. It is pretty easy to get stuck in this process and fail to follow through… //
 Quote 2 ID 9: …when I got to see this training, I felt that I was pretty good at implementation, simply out of experience. I have learned through experience. But what I haven’t done is a structured implementation action plan, previously I had gone through the steps only in my head. This structured process plan, I feel…will give me an enormous strength in the future.
 Quote 3 ID2: Yes, I really appreciated those exercises, both when we were to give a talk [about our implementation case] and catch the others’ interest, and then this exercise where there was a challenge…where there was a group that had been told to have different opinions [about the implementation case] and then a manager tried to handle that. // I think that was very valuable. Role plays and when you get to practice with each other, that helped me a lot.

Independent t-test did not reveal significant differences between the two groups.