Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;10(2):e035012. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035012

Table 3.

Regression estimates (relative risk ratios and 95% CI) of poor SRH relative to excellent SRH from multivariate logistic regression models on SRH trajectory group membership

Excellent Poor SRH trajectory
Covariate SRH Model 1* Model 2* Model 3*
n=8679 n=8679 n=8590
Age Ref. 1.01 (0.99 to 1.04) 1.02 (0.99 to 1.05) 1.01 (0.98 to 1.04)
Sex
 Male Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Female Ref. 1.44 (1.09 to 1.90) 1.66 (1.24 to 2.22) 1.46 (1.10 to 1.94)
Education
 Low Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Intermediate Ref. 0.76 (0.55 to 1.05) 0.77 (0.56 to 1.07) 0.79 (0.57 to 1.10)
 High Ref. 0.50 (0.37 to 0.68) 0.56 (0.42 to 0.77) 0.54 (0.40 to 0.74)
Chronic diseases
 None Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 1 Ref. 7.80 (5.74 to 10.61) 7.03 (5.16 to 9.57) 7.76 (5.70 to 10.58)
 ≥2 Ref. 26.42 (16.12 to 43.30) 21.11 (12.80 to 34.82) 25.08 (15.28 to 41.17)
Physical activity for at least 30 min
 ≥5 days/week Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 2–4 days/week Ref. 1.63 (1.22 to 2.18) 1.55 (1.16 to 2.08) 1.61 (1.20 to 2.15)
 ≤1 day/week Ref. 2.82 (1.75 to 4.54) 2.55 (1.58 to 4.13) 2.85 (1.76 to 4.59)
Smoking status
 Never Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Former Ref. 1.40 (1.07 to 1.83) 1.38 (1.05 to 1.80) 1.39 (1.06 to 1.82)
 Current Ref. 1.71 (1.03 to 2.85) 1.70 (1.01 to 2.84) 1.65 (0.98 to 2.78)
Alcohol consumption
 Abstainer Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Low risk Ref. 0.51 (0.36 to 0.71) 0.53 (0.38 to 0.75) 0.50 (0.35 to 0.71)
 At risk Ref. 0.48 (0.33 to 0.69) 0.51 (0.35 to 0.74) 0.47 (0.33 to 0.69)
Abnormal values of physiological markers†
 Body composition Ref. 1.35 (1.03 to 1.76)
 Cardiovascular function Ref. 1.36 (1.06 to 1.73)
 Lung function Ref. 1.12 (0.84 to 1.50)
 Glucose metabolism Ref. 3.77 (1.71 to 8.31)
 Haematological condition Ref. 1.48 (0.95 to 2.31)
 Endocrine function Ref. 0.97 (0.53 to 1.79)
 Renal function Ref. 0.74 (0.56 to 0.97)
 Liver function Ref. 1.78 (1.16 to 2.74)
 Cognitive function Ref. 1.53 (1.00 to 2.34)
Sum score of physiological markers
 ≤2 affected Ref. Ref.
 ≥3 affected Ref.  1.51 (1.16 to 1.96)

Participants with missing data for covariates were excluded from the analyses.

*Fit statistics: Model 1: AIC: 1.807, BIC: −62 488; Model 2: AIC: 1.811, BIC: −61 942; Model 3: AIC: 1.804, BIC: −61 718.

†Participants with normal values of the physiological markers were used as the reference category.

AIC, Akaike information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion; n, number of participants; ref, reference category.