Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;10(2):e035012. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035012

Table 4.

ORs and 95% CI per predictor for being member of the good, moderate or poor SRH trajectory group relative to the excellent group (n=8590*)

Predictor
OR (95% CI)
Exc. SRH Good SRH Moderate SRH Poor SRH
n=471 n=1716 n=5637 n=766
Age
 65–69 Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 70–74 Ref. 0.99 (0.75 to 1.33) 0.93 (0.72 to 1.19) 1.03 (0.77 to 1.41)
 75–79 Ref. 1.38 (0.89 to 2.39) 1.33 (0.88 to 2.18) 1.34 (0.81 to 2.30)
 ≥80 Ref. 1.15 (0.56 to 2.59) 1.08 (0.60 to 2.31) 1.12 (0.56 to 2.78)
Sex
 Male Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Female† Ref. 1.03 (0.76 to 1.39) 1.21 (0.95 to 1.55) 1.43 (1.03 to 1.94)
Education
 Low Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Intermediate† Ref. 1.10 (0.78 to 1.53) 0.87 (0.646 to 1.19) 0.76 (0.51 to 1.12)
 High† Ref. 0.96 (0.73 to 1.28) 0.54 (0.41 to 0.68) 0.47 (0.33 to 0.66)
Chronic diseases
 None Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 1 Ref. 2.11 (1.54 to 2.93) 3.55 (2.80 to 4.94) 10.38 (7.38 to 14.72)
 ≥2 Ref. 1.60 (0.92 to 3.30) 5.29 (3.35 to 10.52) 37.79 (22.35 to 71.75)
Physical activity for at least 30 min
 ≥5 days/week Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 2–4 days/week† Ref. 0.99 (0.76 to 1.39) 1.35 (1.08 to 1.80) 1.61 (1.18 to 2.20)
 ≤1 day/week Ref. 0.95 (0.54 to 1.76) 1.42 (0.90 to 2.40) 3.12 (1.76 to 5.16)
Smoking status
 Never Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Former‡ Ref. 1.08 (0.82 to 1.42) 1.15 (0.91 to 1.44) 1.48 (1.11 to 1.98)
 Current† Ref. 1.09 (0.66 to 1.95) 1.42 (0.93 to 2.30) 1.80 (1.02 to 3.16)
Alcohol consumption
 Abstainer Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 Low risk Ref. 1.38 (0.93 to 2.16) 0.86 (0.62 to 1.19) 0.52 (0.35 to 0.77)
 At risk Ref. 1.40 (0.97 to 2.12) 0.78 (0.57 to 1.10) 0.46 (0.31 to 0.70)
Sum score of physiological markers
 ≤2 affected Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
 ≥3 affected Ref.  0.89 (0.69 to 1.21)  1.10 (0.88 to 1.45)  1.50 (1.14 to 2.03)

Final trajectory model including identified predictors of SRH trajectory membership by multinomial logistic regression analysis (table 2, model 3) adjusted for age (5 year intervals from 65 years old), education and sex.

*3010 of 11 600 participants aged 65 years and older were excluded from the analysis due to missing data on covariates included in the final model.

†Wald tests showed no differences between poor and moderate SRH trajectories (p>0.05).

‡Wald tests showed no differences between moderate and good SRH trajectories (p>0.05).

Exc, excellent; Ref, reference category; SRH, self-rated health.