Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 19;10(1):e033481. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033481

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included papers addressing demand, use and outcomes in OOHS

Characteristics Number (%) of papers
Country/regional setting (n=105)
 Mainland Europe and Republic of Ireland 57 (54.3)
 UK 37 (35.2)
 USA, Australia, or New Zealand 6 (5.7)
 International 5 (4.8)
Year of publication (n=105)
 1995–1999 14 (13.3)
 2000–2004 14 (13.3)
 2005–2009 16 (15.2)
 2010–2014 29 (27.7)
 2015–2019 (up to March 2019) 32 (30.5)
Study design (n=105)
 Routine data analysis 41 (39.1)
 Retrospective case review 17 (16.2)
 Prospective case review 14 (13.3)
 Observational (case–control or cohort studies) 6 (5.7)
 Questionnaire/survey 14 (13.3)
 Mixed methods 5 (4.8)
 Reviews/systematic reviews 5 (4.8)
 Other 3 (2.8)
Patient focus (n=101)
 General 63 (63.4)
 Adults (aged 16 and over) 2 (2.0)
 Elderly only (65 years and over) 2 (2.0)
 Children (under 16 years) 6 (5.9)
 Cancer/palliative patients 6 (5.9)
 Mental health/psychiatric patients 4 (4.0)
 Other (includes frequent attenders (4); patients with chronic disease (4); migrant patients (n=2)) 18 (17.8)
Main setting (n=151*)
 GP out-of-hours cooperative 86 (57.0)
 Accident and emergency/emergency department 21 (13.9)
 Telephone triage service (eg, NHS Direct, NHS 24, NHS 111) 12 (8.0)
 GP deputising service 9 (5.9)
 Urgent care centre 4 (2.6)
 Walk-in clinic 3 (2.0)
 Other (eg, ambulance; casualty clinic; community hospital; minor injury unit; OOH palliative care service; daytime general practice) 16 (10.6)

*More than 105 due to multiple settings in some papers.

GP, general practitioner; NHS, National Health Service; OOH, out of hours; OOHS, out-of-hours health services.