Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 2;10(1):e034114. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034114

Table 2.

The main, subgroup and sensitivity analyses

Subgroup No. of studies Sample size B versus non-B O versus non-O A versus non-A AB versus non-AB
RR (95% CI) P value RR (95% CI) P value RR (95% CI) P value RR (95% CI) P value
All studies 38 6 487 481 0.92 (0.86 to 0.98) 0.007 1.07 (0.99 to 1.15) 0.082 1.01 (0.96 to 1.07) 0.728 1.04 (0.95 to 1.13) 0.419
HBV prevalence
 Higher endemic areas (≥5%) 14 3 983 732 0.90 (0.83 to 0.98) 0.013 1.12 (1.01 to 1.24) 0.025 0.99 (0.91 to 1.08) 0.82 1.00 (0.89 to 1.14) 0.962
 Lower endemic areas (<5%) 24 2 503 749 0.93 (0.85 to 1.02) 0.126 1.03 (0.93 to 1.15) 0.566 1.03 (0.95 to 1.11) 0.471 1.06 (0.95 to 1.18) 0.292
Race
 Caucasian 23 2 488 675 0.96 (0.87 to 1.05) 0.386 1.04 (0.94 to 1.16) 0.465 1.03 (0.94 to 1.13) 0.472 1.05 (0.93 to 1.18) 0.461
 Asian 7 3 920 902 0.91 (0.86 to 0.97) 0.003 1.10 (0.99 to 1.22) 0.075 0.98 (0.97 to 0.99) <0.001 0.96 (0.87 to 1.06) 0.451
 African 8 77 904 0.78 (0.58 to 1.05) 0.099 1.04 (0.77 to 1.40) 0.803 0.99 (0.73 to 1.33) 0.919 1.02 (0.62 to 1.67) 0.953
Sample size
 ≥2000 24 6 475 196 0.93 (0.87 to 0.99) 0.018 1.07 (0.98 to 1.16) 0.135 0.99 (0.94 to 1.05) 0.795 1.00 (0.92 to 1.08) 0.914
 <2000 14 12 285 0.85 (0.64 to 1.13) 0.275 1.08 (0.90 to 1.29) 0.398 1.07 (0.85 to 1.33) 0.577 1.20 (0.89 to 1.61) 0.238
Population
 General 6 3 910 128 0.93 (0.87 to 0.99) 0.016 1.07 (0.99 to 1.15) 0.078 0.98 (0.96 to 1.00) 0.035 0.89 (0.88 to 0.90) <0.001
 Blood donors 29 2 574 698 0.89 (0.81 to 0.97) 0.011 1.08 (0.97 to 1.20) 0.154 1.01 (0.92 to 1.10) 0.885 1.08 (0.95 to 1.23) 0.248
 Patients 3 2655 0.92 (0.71 to 1.19) 0.517 1.04 (0.71 to 1.54) 0.828 1.09 (0.91 to 1.30) 0.345 1.17 (0.94 to 1.46) 0.169
Income group
 High 7 148 804 0.96 (0.91 to 1.00) 0.065 1.17 (0.95 to 1.44) 0.135 0.91 (0.74 to 1.11) 0.343 0.97 (0.84 to 1.13) 0.712
 Upper middle 9 6 101 344 1.01 (0.88 to 1.15) 0.927 0.97 (0.82 to 1.15) 0.756 1.00 (0.96 to 1.06) 0.791 1.02 (0.88 to 1.17) 0.814
 Lower middle 18 214 587 0.86 (0.76 to 0.97) 0.011 1.03 (0.93 to 1.13) 0.582 1.13 (1.01 to 1.25) 0.03 1.13 (0.95 to 1.34) 0.173
 Low 4 22 746 0.88 (0.56 to 1.38) 0.572 1.34 0.72 to 2.48) 0.353 0.71 (0.42 to 1.21) 0.209 0.84 (0.43 to 1.64) 0.613
Study design
 Cross-sectional 37 6 408 776 0.91 (0.85 to 0.97) 0.007 1.07 (0.98 to 1.17) 0.111 1.01 (0.95 to 1.08) 0.78 1.06 (0.96 to 1.17) 0.244
 Cohort 1 78 705 0.96 (0.92 to 1.01) 0.098 1.05 (1.01 to 1.10) 0.016 1.00 (0.95 to 1.05) 0.957 0.92 (0.84 to 1.00) 0.053
Publication year
 Before 2010 17 123 268 0.80 (0.67 to 0.96) 0.015 1.12 (0.97 to 1.29) 0.112 1.02 (0.85 to 1.22) 0.83 1.22 (1.01 to 1.46) 0.04
 After 2010 21 6 364 213 0.95 (0.88 to 1.01) 0.106 1.05 (0.95 to 1.15) 0.335 1.00 (0.94 to 1.06) 0.91 0.98 (0.89 to 1.07) 0.627
Sensitive analyses
 Removed Liu’s study17 37 2 660 356 0.91 (0.85 to 0.98) 0.012 1.06 (0.98 to 1.15) 0.138 1.01 (0.94 to 1.08) 0.816 1.06 (0.97 to 1.17) 0.213
 Removed Mohammedali’s study18 37 4 459 413 0.91 (0.85 to 0.97) 0.002 1.08 (1.00 to 1.16) 0.044 1.01 (0.94 to 1.07) 0.857 1.04 (0.95 to 1.14) 0.445
 Removed both Liu’s and Mohammedali’s study17 18 36 632 288 0.90 (0.83 to 0.97) 0.007 1.07 (0.98 to 1.17) 0.115 1.00 (0.92 to 1.09) 0.946 1.08 (0.96 to 1.20) 0.211

HBV, Hepatitis B virus; RR, risk ratio.