Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 27;2020(2):CD011024. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011024.pub2

14. Comparison 8: counter‐stimulation and distraction, versus conventional treatment.

Study Outcome Intervention 1: counter‐stimulation (groups C+SA) Intervention 2: distraction and counter‐stimulation (group CD+SA) Control: conventional LA (group SA) Results
Aminabadi 2008 Distress: Sound, Eyes, and Motor (SEM) scale; 0 to 4 for each of 4 categories, intraoperatively, investigator Sound: 1.67
Eyes: 1.67
Movement: 1.73
Sum: 5.07
(n = 26)
Sound: 1.26
Eyes: 1.03
Movement: 1.12
Sum: 3.41
(n = 26)
Sound: 2.75
Eyes: 2.67
Movement: 2.83
Sum: 8.25
(n = 26)
"... difference between group SA and group C+SA was statistically significant (P < 0.05); group CD+SA surpassed group SA (P < 0.05)... Pain reaction on C+SA significantly more than group CD+SA (P < 0.05)"

LA = local anaesthetic; n = number.