Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 27;2020(2):CD011024. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011024.pub2

Comparison 4. Camouflage syringe versus conventional syringe.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Pain‐related behaviour 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Children who cried 1 100 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.02 [0.00, 0.37]
1.2 Children who did not smile 1 100 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.12 [0.06, 0.26]
2 Overall anxiety and behavioural changes (Venham's clinical rating scale, from 0 to 5 with 5 being the worst) 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only