Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 2;245(3):180–189. doi: 10.1177/1535370219892601

Table 4.

[Ca2+]i oscillation for control, TRPV4-KD, Piezo1-KD, and Piezo2-KD stimulated with 8% CTS stimulation (mean ± standard deviation).

8% CTS control (n = 47) 8% CTS TRPV4-KD (n = 38) 8% CTS Piezo1-KD (n = 41) 8% CTS Piezo2-KD (n = 42)
[Ca2+]i response rates (%) 20.12 ± 1.72 13.04 ± 1.16 ↓ 21.45 ± 1.87 20.18 ± 1.99
Amplitude 7.07 ± 0.51 3.01 ± 0.27 ↓ 6.64 ± 0.67 6.42 ± 0.59
Frequency (Peaks/min) 0.20 ± 0.01 0.17 ± 0.01 ↓ 0.20 ± 0.02 0.19 ± 0.02

Note: Cell numbers examined for [Ca2+]i oscillation were 47 cells (control), 38 cells (TRPV4-KD), 41 cells (Piezo1-KD), and 42 cells (Piezo2-KD) for 8% CTS, respectively. Data are represented as the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments.

TRPV4: transient receptor potential vanilloid 4; CTS: cyclic tensile strains; KD: knockdown.