Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 2;245(3):180–189. doi: 10.1177/1535370219892601

Table 6.

[Ca2+]i oscillation for control, TRPV4-KD, Piezo1-KD, and Piezo2-KD stimulated with 18% CTS stimulation (mean ± standard deviation).

18% CTS control (n = 37) 18% CTS TRPV4-KD (n = 42) 18% CTS Piezo1-KD (n = 45) 18% CTS Piezo2-KD (n = 38)
[Ca2+]i response rates (%) 23.55 ± 2.14 24.16 ± 2.37 24.03 ± 2.19 15.21 ± 1.28 ↓
Amplitude 10.06 ± 0.96 9.84 ± 0.87 9.35 ± 0.91 3.96 ± 0.34 ↓
Frequency (Peaks/min) 0.20 ± 0.02 0.21 ± 0.02 0.21 ± 0.02 0.14 ± 0.01 ↓

Note: Cell numbers examined for [Ca2+]i oscillation were 37 cells (control), 42 cells (TRPV4-KD), 45 cells (Piezo1-KD), and 38 cells (Piezo2-KD) for 18% CTS, respectively. Data are represented as the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments.

TRPV4: transient receptor potential vanilloid 4; CTS: cyclic tensile strains; KD: knockdown.