Skip to main content
. 2016 May 9;2016(5):CD000544. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000544.pub4

Ardizzone 1995.

Methods Single‐center, randomized, double‐blind comparison of Claversal and SASP. Clinical, endoscopic and histological examinations were performed at entry, after 6 months, and after 12 months
Participants Patients, aged 18 to 61 years, with clinical and endoscopically quiescent ulcerative colitis, who had an episode of active disease requiring systemic corticosteroids at least once in the previous 12 months (N = 88)
Interventions 5‐ASA (Claversal), 1 g daily (n = 44), or SASP, 2 g daily (n = 44), for 1 year. Topical corticosteroids were permitted for short‐term treatment of mild distal relapses
Outcomes Relapse of disease was defined as the appearance of bloody diarrhea with endoscopic signs of inflammation requiring systemic steroids (major relapse). "Minor relapses" were defined as those requiring a few days of topical corticosteroids. The number of withdrawals due to adverse effects was also reported
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double‐blind
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Drop‐outs balanced across intervention groups with similar reasons for withdrawal
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Expected outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk The study appears to be free of other sources of bias