Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 22;13(3):575–599. doi: 10.1111/eva.12879

Table 1.

Groups used in the analyses of ancestry comparisons and correlations of distortion. The location and ancestry composition of subgroups are indicated in Figure 1. The native genetic backgrounds possibly encountered are indicated for cases of introduction (n/a: not applicable)

Group Native genetic background Admixture pattern Sub‐group Populations used
Dock mussels South‐Eu. M. edulis or Atl. M. galloprovincialis Med. M. galloprovincialis / South‐Eu. M. edulis

havre

cher

stmalo

brest

stnaz

Port of Le Havre

Port of Cherbourg

Port of Saint‐Malo

Bay of Brest

Port of Saint‐Nazaire

F2 n/a idem F2 F1 female × F1 males
Backcrosses (BCs) n/a idem

BCG

BCF1

gallo_med females × F1 males

F1 female × gallo_med males

Norway admixed North‐Eu. M. galloprovincialis (sometimes M. trossulus) Atl. M. galloprovincialis / North‐Eu. M. edulis

LOF

GAS

Lofoten Islands, Norway

Gåseid, Norway

Naturally admixed n/a Atl. M. galloprovincialis / South‐Eu. M. edulis

ABD

MCH

JER

HZSB

Aberdeen, Scotland

Murchison oil station

Jersey Island

Mousterlin point (MOU)

La Jument (JUM)

Barres de Pen Bron (PEN)

Chemoulin point (CHE)

Groix

Penestin (BIL_001)

Le Pouliguen (POU_001)

Houat Island (HOU_001)