Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 21;2016(4):CD000543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000543.pub4

Marakhouski 2005.

Methods Multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, double‐dummy, parallel‐group study
Participants Adult patients (18 to 70 years) with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis (N = 233)
Interventions Mesalazine pellets (Salofalk; n = 115) or mesalazine tablets (n = 118) at an initial dose of 1.5 g/day. In case of inadequate response the dose could be increased up to 3 g/day after the first follow‐up visit at 2 weeks. Patients were treated for 8 weeks
Outcomes The primary outcome was complete response (clinical remission) defined as CAI < 4 at individual study end. Secondary outcomes: time to first response; endoscopic remission (defined as EI < 4) and improvement; histological improvement; and physician’s global assessment
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double‐blind, double‐dummy: Placebos of identical appearance to 5‐ASA tablets and pellets were used to ensure double‐blind performance of the trial
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk 13.5% drop‐out rate. Drop‐outs were balanced across groups. Reasons for dropping out were summarized across both groups
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Expected outcomes were reported
Other bias Low risk The study appears to be free of other sources of bias