Oka 1990.
Methods | Multicenter double‐blind, placebo controlled randomised clinical trial with parallel group design (two interventions groups). Trial duration: 24 weeks. Follow‐up: 4 patients receiving ursodeoxycholic acid and 3 placebo dropped out. |
|
Participants | Country: Japan. Number of patients randomised: 52, from 13 departments in Japan, mean age 59 years (91% females). Inclusion criteria: ‐ PBC was diagnosed clinically and histologically. Exclusion criteria: ‐ patients with severe symptoms or having received other medications for their PBC within the last three months. |
|
Interventions | Patients were randomly assigned to receive: Intervention group 1: ursodeoxycholic acid 600 mg/day in three divided doses, n = 26; Intervention group 2: placebo, n = 26. |
|
Outcomes | Symptoms (itching). Complications (oesophageal varices). Liver biochemistry. Serum cholesterol. Serum bile acids. | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | The trial is described as randomised, but the method of sequence generation was not specified. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Allocation was controlled by a single monitor according to a randomisation scheme (1:1), so that intervention allocations could not have been foreseen in advance of, or during, enrolment. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "Placebo tablets could not be distinguished from ursodeoxycholic acid tablets". |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The numbers and reasons for dropouts and withdrawals in all intervention groups were described. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Pre‐defined, or clinically relevant and reasonably expected outcomes are reported on. |
Other bias | Low risk | The trial appears to be free of information that could put it at risk of bias. |