Skip to main content
. 2000 Oct 23;2000(4):CD001481. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001481

Jaber 1996.

Methods RCT (randomised by patient) 
 Randomisation concealment: NOT CLEAR 
 Follow up: 
 ‐ providers: N/A 
 ‐ patients: DONE 
 Blinded assessment: DONE for laboratory outcomes, health related quality of life 
 NOT CLEAR for blood pressure, weight, patient compliance 
 Baseline: DONE for fasting plasma glucose, glycated haemoglobin, serum Creatinine, BMI microalbumin/Creatinine ratio, total body weight NOT CLEAR for the other outcomes 
 Reliable outcomes: DONE for laboratory outcomes, health related quality of life 
 NOT CLEAR for blood pressure, weight, patient compliance 
 Protection against contamination: NOT CLEAR
Participants A university‐affiliated general internal medicine outpatient clinic (US). 
 Intervention group received care by a pharmacist, the control group by physicians. 
 Urban African‐American patients attending the clinic. Of 156 eligible patients 45 were randomised and 39 completed the study (Type 2 diabetes). 
 providers ‐ ? 
 (pharmacist + 
 physicians) 
 patients ‐ 45 
 practices ‐ 1 outpatient 
 clinic
Interventions Intervention group: Organisational intervention (revision of professional roles 
 (all diabetes‐related management aspects were solely provided by a pharmacist) + patient education on glycaemic control and self‐monitoring of blood glucose
Control group: usual care by physician
Length of intervention: 
 4 months
Outcomes PROCESS: 
 NONE
PATIENT: 
 Primary outcomes: 
 Fasting plasma glucose 
 Glycated haemoglobin
Secondary outcomes: 
 Blood pressure 
 Body weight 
 Serum lipid measurements 
 Renal function parameters 
 Quality of life
Notes Care was provided consistent with, but broader than that described by Helper and Strand (reference 16 in study). The guidelines are not specified. 
 ‐directed at treatment 
 ‐targets: glycaemic control 
 secondary targets: blood pressure, body weight 
 serum lipid measurements, 
 renal function parameters, 
 quality of life
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear