Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 27.
Published in final edited form as: Stem Cell Res. 2019 Dec 6;42:101673. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2019.101673

Table 2.

Characterization and validation.

Classification Test Result Data
Morphology Photography Normal Fig. 1A
Phenotype Qualitative analysis: Immunocytochemistry Positive for SOX2, OCT4, NANOG, SSEA-4 Fig. 1A
Quantitative analysis: Flow Cytometry (tdTom1, tdTom4) TRA-1-60 (98.21%, 95.77%); NANOG (99.30%, 92.39%); SSEA-4 (93.11%, 99.46%); tdTomato (99.66%, 99.89%) Fig. 1B
Genotype Karyotype (G-banding) and resolution 46XY; Resolution 425–500 Supplementary Fig. S1A
Identity Microsatellite PCR (mPCR) OR STR analysis Not performed N/A
15 loci plus amelogenin (Promega PowerPlex 16) tested, all matched Available with the authors
Mutation analysis (IF APPLICABLE) Sequencing N/A N/A
Southern Blot Monoallelic targeted integration without random integration Supplementary Fig. S1B
Microbiology and virology Mycoplasma testing by qPCR Negative Supplementary Fig. S1C
Differentiation potential Teratoma formation Teratoma formed with three germ layers: Ectoderm, Mesoderm, and Endoderm Fig. 1C
Donor screening (OPTIONAL) HIV 1 + 2 Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C N/A N/A
Genotype additional info (OPTIONAL) Blood group genotyping N/A N/A
HLA tissue typing N/A N/A