Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 28;2020(2):CD008959. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008959.pub3

Sharieff 2006a.

Methods Study design: randomised placebo‐controlled trial
Unit and method of allocation: individual
Method of sequence generation: computer‐generated random selection of children from each geographical zone
Masking of participants, personnel, and outcome assessors: study participants, field staff, and data analyst were blinded
Participants Location of the study: Bilal Colony, an urban slum neighbourhood in Karachi, Pakistan
Sample size: 75 infants
Age: 6 to 12 months
Sex: 56% boys in micronutrient group, 28% boys in control group
Socioeconomic status: similar at baseline between groups (report ethnicity, maternal education, family income, housing structure)
Baseline prevalence of anaemia: not reported
Baseline prevalence of soil helminths: not reported
Baseline malaria prevalence: not reported
Inclusion and exclusion criteria: inclusion criteria included intent to reside in the area for 2 or more months, parental consent, and child able to ingest any type of semi‐solid weaning food, 1 or more episode of diarrhoea within previous 2 weeks
Interventions Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups
Interventions
  1. Group 1* (n = 25): children received daily a micronutrient powder containing 30 mg of elemental iron (as encapsulated ferrous fumarate), 5 mg of zinc (as gluconate), 300 μg of vitamin A, 50 mg of vitamin C, 7.5 μg of vitamin D3, and 150 μg (0.15 mg) of folic acid

  2. Group 2 (n = 25): children received daily a micronutrient powder containing 5 mg of zinc (as gluconate), 30 mg of elemental iron (as microencapsulated ferrous fumarate), 50 mg of vitamin C, 300 μg of vitamin A, 7.5 μg of vitamin D3, and 150 μg (0.15 mg) of folic acid and heat‐inactivated Lactobacillis acidophilus at a concentration of 1 to 2 × 10⁹ colony‐forming units (CFUs) per dose


Comparison
Group 3* (n = 25): children received daily placebo (containing ground purple rice with maltodextrin)
Interventions were provided in small screw‐cap plastic containers with powders that were similar in appearance and taste; mothers and caregivers were instructed to open the containers and mix the entire contents with semi‐solid meal provided to the child once each day
*For the purposes of this review, only groups 1 and 3 were compared
Duration of intervention: 2 months
Outcomes Primary: longitudinal prevalence of diarrhoea (defined as 3 or more liquid or loose stools in the past 24 hours). Longitudinal prevalence was defined as percentage of days that the child had diarrhoea over the observation period
Secondary: febrile days per child, compliance, haemoglobin concentrations, serum ferritin concentrations, anaemia, iron deficiency. Stool cultures at baseline (for Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, Yersinia, enteropathic Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae, and Giardia lamblia)
Timing of outcome assessment: number of diarrhoeal stools, days of diarrhoea, dysentery, vomiting, presence of fever (and intensity and duration), respiratory symptoms, and drug usage assessed twice a week; blood samples collected at end of 2 months
Notes Study start date: January 2003
Study end date: March 2003
Conflict(s) of interest: co‐author (S Zlotkin) owns intellectual property rights to micronutrient Sprinkles™
Funding source(s): Canadian Institutes of Health Research, HJ Heinz Foundation, Institut Rosell Lallemand
Malaria‐endemic area: yes
Comment
Compliance was measured by counting the used supplements for each child whose supplements were not shared or lost. 91% of children consumed half of MNP (mean number 36)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Comment: children assigned to treatment via a computer programme
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: study authors provided identical, small screw‐cap plastic containers filled with micronutrients (with or without probiotic) or placebo in powder form, which were similar in appearance and taste
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: study authors provided identical, small screw‐cap plastic containers filled with micronutrients (with or without probiotic) or placebo in powder form, which were similar in appearance and taste. Study participants and field staff were blinded to random allocation
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: data analysts blinded to random allocation
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: 1 child dropped out from the intervention group and 1 from the comparison group
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: information insufficient to permit judgement
Other bias High risk Comment: haemoglobin and ferritin were not measured at baseline, making it difficult to judge comparability between groups. Only 61% of the original population agreed to provide a blood sample at the end of the study